Sentencing Advisory PanelCAUSING DEATH BY DANGEROUS DRIVING: PANEL PUBLISHES ADVICE TO COURT OF APPEAL ON SENTENCING GUIDELINES

PRESS NOTICE SAP 1/03

18 February 2003

 

The Sentencing Advisory Panel has today published a proposal that the Court of Appeal should issue a sentencing guideline on the offence of causing death by dangerous driving.

The Panel believes that this offence causes particular difficulty for sentencers. On the one hand, an offence involving a person's death is always serious, and understandably leads to calls for severe sentences. On the other hand, an offender convicted of this offence did not deliberately cause death or serious injury. In some cases, the driver may have made a momentary error, but in the worst type of case he or she may be very much to blame, having driven for several miles with complete disregard for the safety of others.

In its proposal the Panel advises that, to mark the gravity of an offence resulting in death, the starting point for sentence should normally be imprisonment. The standard of the offender's driving at the time of the offence should be the primary factor in determining the seriousness of an offence.

The Panel recommends:

Factors that would increase the seriousness of an offence include:

Notes for editors

1.    The Sentencing Advisory Panel is an independent advisory and consultative body constituted under sections 80 and 81 of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998. The Panel is sponsored by the Home Office and the Lord Chancellor's Department. It started work on 1 July 1999. Its function is to provide fully researched, objective advice to the Court of Appeal to assist the Court when it frames or revises sentencing guidelines.

2.    Section 1 of the Road Traffic Act 1988, as substituted by section 1 of the Road Traffic Act 1991, establishes the offence of causing 'the death of another person by driving a mechanically propelled vehicle dangerously on a road or other public place.' The offence is triable only on indictment, and the maximum penalty is 10 years' imprisonment. Disqualification for a minimum period of two years and endorsement are obligatory, and the offence carries 3 to 11 penalty points. The Government has announced its intention of increasing the maximum sentence to 14 years, but no date has been given for the change.

3.    Since 26 June 2002, when the Panel published its third annual report to the Home Secretary and the Lord Chancellor, the Panel has published a proposal that the Court of Appeal should frame a sentencing guideline on offences involving child pornography (published August 2002; guidelines issued by the Court of Appeal in Oliver and others, 21 November 2002). The Court of Appeal has also made use of the Panel's advice in guideline judgments on rape (in Millberry and others, 9 December 2002) and domestic burglary (in McInerney and Keating, 20 December 2002).

Copies of the Panel's latest proposal may be obtained from: Gareth Sweny, Sentencing Advisory Panel, Room G11, Allington Towers, 19 Allington Street, London SW1E 5EB.